New Love

New Love
2006.01.04 3:54

As I wrote in my last JE, I got a new love. But who cares about love between 47 year old menopausal woman and 44 year old single guy? I don't think there are many. She is a beautiful woman with slender body but her aging in naked body was apparent. I will be able to learn the wisdom of life which I am unable to do from young girls. Above of all things, I can quench my loneliness with the woman, that's more than anything.
List all Journal entries
New Love Preferences Top 7 comments Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold: -1: 7 comments 0: 7 comments 1: 7 comments 2: 3 comments 3: 0 comments 4: 0 comments 5: 0 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads) Save:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Well(Score:2)
by Stargoat (658863) <stargoat@gmail.com> on 2006.01.04 4:10 (#14386109) (Last Journal: 2006.01.08 2:52)
I prefer an older lady myself. There's less foolishness.
--The hallmark work of man for the past eight thousand years has been the creation of a more accurate model of reality.[ Reply to This ]
Re:Well(Score:1)
by mercedo (822671) * on 2006.01.04 4:35 (#14386312) (http://mercedo-the-eve.blogspot.com/ Last Journal: 2006.01.09 14:35)
As to this, I accord with your opinion completely.
--Ancient Greek Philosophers -18c Enlightenment Thinkers -Slashdotters[ Reply to This Parent ]
Re:Well(Score:1)
by hzs202 (932886) on 2006.01.05 5:39 (#14395100) (http://uranus.dontexist.com/ Last Journal: 2006.01.06 5:04)
I prefer an older lady myself. There's less foolishness.Less foolishness yes... however, what ear plugs and temporary blindness can't handle with the young women cash can. As for the aging body... ewwww! I'm sorry if I'm being offensive but I would much rather perky boobs and a tight buttocks, if I want stimulating conversation at 44, I'll go for a PhD.
--hzs202[ Reply to This Parent ]
Re:Well(Score:2)
by Stargoat (658863) <stargoat@gmail.com> on 2006.01.05 5:57 (#14395247) (Last Journal: 2006.01.08 2:52)
Glad to see that you think so highly of women. Give yourself a big pat on the back. (Dude, it's not Tuesday.)
--The hallmark work of man for the past eight thousand years has been the creation of a more accurate model of reality.[ Reply to This Parent ]
Re:Well(Score:1)
by hzs202 (932886) on 2006.01.05 6:37 (#14395622) (http://uranus.dontexist.com/ Last Journal: 2006.01.06 5:04)
Give yourself a big pat on the back.I will because I had the balls to say (write) it! You can love me or hate me, but the reality is Beyonce, Masha Sharapova and Jessica Alba are all great talents but their beauty and *features* make them SUPER-STARS!Go ahead, disprove that... face it men are pigs, women love me because I embrace my inner-pig, it's the pretenders that I'm told turn their stomachs.
--hzs202[ Reply to This Parent ]
Re:Well(Score:2)
by Stargoat (658863) <stargoat@gmail.com> on 2006.01.05 8:16 (#14396513) (Last Journal: 2006.01.08 2:52)
Who? Emma Thompson (wow-zah) or Annette Bening is the girl for me.
--The hallmark work of man for the past eight thousand years has been the creation of a more accurate model of reality.[ Reply to This Parent ]
Re:Well(Score:1)
by hzs202 (932886) on 2006.01.06 0:00 (#14400096) (http://uranus.dontexist.com/ Last Journal: 2006.01.06 5:04)
Dude... Emma Thompson starred in her first film when she was 30 years old (The Tall Guy, 1989), she was also part of a BBC television series about World War II prior to that. That is most likely when you were introduced to her, right? Wasn't the upper region... very perky and the lower... very firm?All jokes aside, I am not trying to degrade women, so please don't take it that way. I'm just having a little fun *grins* the way a young-man should!Best,
--hzs202[ Reply to This Parent ]