Origin Of War

Origin Of War
2006.05.18 2:57

In general in resignation, there seem two types. One is the case in which people are already well treated but resign in seeking for better conditions. The other case is that his position is not well paid and he has to seek for another less miserable conditions.
Economy is constantly shrinking these days so it is needless to say that the latter case is overwhelmingly more. This case is a kind of Hobson's choice.
I feel scary when I thought about what there were in the end. We have more unemployed or half-unemployed than now. After all some population will be unable to feed themselves. Here arises the best way to solve this problem, that is mutual annihilation between two counterparts, people call it a war. In the end war is a final solution for population problem, food problem, and umemployment problem.
It will seem to take around several decades to reach such a stage though, I seem to have no effective measures to prevent it.
List all Journal entries
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
I am willing to help test Slashdot's New Discussion System.
Origin Of War Preferences Top 2 comments Search Discussion
Display OptionsThreshold: -1: 2 comments 0: 2 comments 1: 2 comments 2: 0 comments 3: 0 comments 4: 0 comments 5: 0 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads) Save:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
yep(Score:1)
by eglamkowski (631706) <.eglamkowski. .at. .angelfire.com.> on 2006.05.18 3:12 (#15352607) (http://www.angelfire.com/nj/eglamkowski Last Journal: 2006.11.26 9:22)
Competition for scarce resources is indeed the cause of many wars. An expanding population needs more food which requires more land which, for some time now, has meant taking it from someone else through force or deception.While it is quite reasonable to suggest that country A could purchase food or resources from country B, it is not always the case that country B is willing to sell to country A, and it is not always the case that country A wants to be reliant upon country B for their survival. When these differences are irreconcilable, we have war.
--Government IS the problem.
Re:yep(Score:1)
by mercedo (822671) * on 2006.05.20 1:11 (#15366165) (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11854854 Last Journal: 2006.11.22 3:02)
I assume war is not merely a result of conflict between two countries. But the most effective way to solve the same problem two countries happen to have had.
Recently I fell unwell. We(our representatives) have been discussing whether to implement a 'plot crime'. Any one who devises some crimes with someone will be punishable by this law. Tory has been trying to pass the law twice so far and now it's three times. They are serious. They intend to pass this bill after all important other bills passed. This time they are serious. Law Affairs Agency(governmental)and Japan's Bar Association have been struggling against one another, but sadly enough under the Diet in which Tory has overwhelming majority, they can pass almost every bill they want. Last election was being held under the single issue -whether we are in favour of the privatisation of post office. Many nationals voted in favour of it and resulted in giving an overwhelming majojority to Tory. Current prime minister is gone soon in September, this year. Only remains the Tory controlled national assembly.
World War II was one of the biggest correction in history to mend huge chasm arised between haves and have-nots. As a result of this big discharge in history, we had enjoyed 'post war democracy'. Recently we have heard the word 'gap society', means the difference between the poor and rich has been increasing. Sadly the gap has been expanding conspicuously, and some time after the process has proceeded, this process will be irreversible. The rich will be super rich, and the poor will never be able to get away from being poor. The poor will lose not only democracy but freedom of expression. They will lose their life too.